Are workplace tattoos still a taboo?
1 Star it
Share
Vikas Shekhawat , Churu, Rajasthan:
Feb 7 2006
Made Popular Feb 7 2006
It’s a big day for employees of San Bernardino County where the county Board of Supervisors are put to vote on the bizarre proposal that strictly bans visible tattoos. The new dress code has raised many eyebrows that enforce casual dress at work...
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
0 Stars
Glenn
Feb 8 2006
Luxembourg,
Luxembourg
San Bernardino County f%#ken sucks...
Comment Link
0 Stars
That’s just it; tattoos can’t hamper one’s work or performance. This, work performance, isn’t the issue either. The issue is the close minded outdated mentality of those in power. Those few near-elites in the work place make policy based on THEIR opinions of what is acceptable. Someone probably thought that tattoos were dirty and only criminals had them. Now they’re to be covered up. I just thought up an interesting question. Just because they are covered doesn’t mean the tattoo is not there. Will the next step in employment be to have them removed for continued employment?
Local Opinions (2)
0 Stars
That’s just it; tattoos can’t hamper one’s work or performance. This, work performance, isn’t the issue either. The issue is the close minded outdated mentality of those in power. Those few near-elites in the work place make policy based on THEIR opinions of what is acceptable. Someone probably thought that tattoos were dirty and only criminals had them. Now they’re to be covered up. I just thought up an interesting question. Just because they are covered doesn’t mean the tattoo is not there. Will the next step in employment be to have them removed for continued employment?
Global Opinions (2)
0 Stars
That’s just it; tattoos can’t hamper one’s work or performance. This, work performance, isn’t the issue either. The issue is the close minded outdated mentality of those in power. Those few near-elites in the work place make policy based on THEIR opinions of what is acceptable. Someone probably thought that tattoos were dirty and only criminals had them. Now they’re to be covered up. I just thought up an interesting question. Just because they are covered doesn’t mean the tattoo is not there. Will the next step in employment be to have them removed for continued employment?
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 



