With the motto, “Towards a Dynamic Community for Sustainable Development and Prosperity” the APEC 2006 Summit, Hanoi, has certainly paved a way for all member nations to work together towards making global economy stronger, dissolving all issues, and give global economy a whopping boost of at least $96 billion a year. The 21-member APEC forum have pledged to revive the deadlock and give a new direction to the WTO talks, that failed four months back in Doha owing to differences over farm subsidies.
The main issues concerned:
1. Cut trade barriers in real sense to enhance global trade keeping in mind profit of all parties concerned
2. More agricultural concessions
3. Give fillip to agricultural market access
4. Real industrial tariff cuts
5. Expanding services trade with collective members’ consensus
6. Analyzing the demand of poorer countries to end export subsidies and tariffs that restrict them from selling farm goods to rich countries
7. To make APEC stronger so that it can come out as a collective force and play a constructive role in combating terrorism and dilute unwanted trade barriers.
The 14th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting ended with a positive note:
1. Vietnam joined as the newest member of the WTO.
2. Russia and US signed bilateral market access agreement moving Russia closer to join WTO. The agreement will boost trade between the two nations and will pave way for more market opportunities for US exporters and industrialists, especially in the field of agriculture, duty-free movement of IT products under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA), tariff reduction on civil aircraft bodies and parts, and also agricultural, construction, scientific and medical equipments.
3. APEC leaders pledged to resume Doha talks with emphasis on practical measures
4. The leaders chalked out plans to reform APEC, make it more effective, and play a vital role in global economy.
5. The leaders committed to fight terrorism and restore peace in the world and region
6. The meet gave Sino-US relations, including trade, a positive direction. Both presidents agreed to work together and solve grave issues such as North Korea and Iran’s nuclear developments.
7. Japan and Chile moved a step further to accelerate Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations
This is the first time member nations came together with an open mind and showed willingness to open markets further. We would like leaders to come to a common consensus and create the much-anticipated ‘Free Trade Bloc’ as soon as possible. The slashing of cross-border trade cost across the region by another 5 per cent by 2010 is welcomed. However, the world leaders in the summit showed little maturity in dealing with North Korea and Iran’s nuclear threat. The leaders emphasized on applying strict sanctions, rather then resuming talks with the two nations and solve the problem and here the main endeavor of APEC to boost global economy takes a back seat. We’ll have to wait and see how far these measures will help the developing countries.
Via: BBC
Their definition and the definition of free trade, are being given by the economists of developing nations conceptualizing by the developing countries, are not same. So, the poor nations should be aware of some realities and propaganda behind all these crying of ”Free Trade”.
>>APEC leaders pledged to resume Doha talks with emphasis on practical measures.
This shows that concerns like farm subsidies given by the Western countries, unfair restrictions produce imports from the poor countries to the rich like shrimps etc. are still very much the concern of the developing APEC nations like China, Vietnam etc.
There cannot be two tunes over a subject in different forums - here APEC and WTO. Priorities and free trade concerns must be addressed first. If the developing economics are stifled, the rich countries will also not escape the fallout.
After all, they need other countries to prosper to business with! So it is in their interest to see the concerns of the developing nations are addressed fairly.
But the nations of developing world should be more cautious on the regulations of Free Trade done anywhere.
Local Opinions (11)
While the APEC leaders have pledged to resume DOHA talks, I doubt if US and Europe will be able to come to a firm decision regarding the reduction of agricultural subsidies this time otherwise the Doha talks will again lead to nowhere
Their definition and the definition of free trade, are being given by the economists of developing nations conceptualizing by the developing countries, are not same. So, the poor nations should be aware of some realities and propaganda behind all these crying of ”Free Trade”.
>>APEC leaders pledged to resume Doha talks with emphasis on practical measures.
This shows that concerns like farm subsidies given by the Western countries, unfair restrictions produce imports from the poor countries to the rich like shrimps etc. are still very much the concern of the developing APEC nations like China, Vietnam etc.
There cannot be two tunes over a subject in different forums - here APEC and WTO. Priorities and free trade concerns must be addressed first. If the developing economics are stifled, the rich countries will also not escape the fallout.
After all, they need other countries to prosper to business with! So it is in their interest to see the concerns of the developing nations are addressed fairly.
But the nations of developing world should be more cautious on the regulations of Free Trade done anywhere.
Global Opinions (11)
While the APEC leaders have pledged to resume DOHA talks, I doubt if US and Europe will be able to come to a firm decision regarding the reduction of agricultural subsidies this time otherwise the Doha talks will again lead to nowhere
Their definition and the definition of free trade, are being given by the economists of developing nations conceptualizing by the developing countries, are not same. So, the poor nations should be aware of some realities and propaganda behind all these crying of ”Free Trade”.
>>APEC leaders pledged to resume Doha talks with emphasis on practical measures.
This shows that concerns like farm subsidies given by the Western countries, unfair restrictions produce imports from the poor countries to the rich like shrimps etc. are still very much the concern of the developing APEC nations like China, Vietnam etc.
There cannot be two tunes over a subject in different forums - here APEC and WTO. Priorities and free trade concerns must be addressed first. If the developing economics are stifled, the rich countries will also not escape the fallout.
After all, they need other countries to prosper to business with! So it is in their interest to see the concerns of the developing nations are addressed fairly.
But the nations of developing world should be more cautious on the regulations of Free Trade done anywhere.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 















While the APEC leaders have pledged to resume DOHA talks, I doubt if US and Europe will be able to come to a firm decision regarding the reduction of agricultural subsidies this time otherwise the Doha talks will again lead to nowhere